ragevalcitations, checked to the character

51/52 quotes found verbatim16/30 answers cite the expected passage0 network calls to replay

q08 · answered by groq/openai/gpt-oss-120b

What does PEP 484 say about runtime enforcement of type hints?

Answer

PEP 484 makes clear that type hints are not enforced at runtime; they are only for optional static analysis tools, and the Python interpreter should ignore them and not change its behavior based on annotations.

Citations 2/2 found

Select a citation to see its characters in the source.

  1. While these annotations are available at runtime through the usual `__annotations__` attribute, *no type checking happens at runtime*.PEP 484 · [1,187, 1,321)Show citation 1 in the source
  2. Python interpreters by default should not issue any messages due to type checking and should not alter their behavior based on annotations.PEP 8 · [45,084, 45,227)Show citation 2 in the source

Expected by the golden set

Hit — A citation overlaps the passage the golden set expects.

Golden answer: Type hints are not enforced at runtime; they are for static checkers.

pep-0484.md

PEP 484 -- Type Hints

Cited
highlighted in yellow
Expected
underlined in blue
85,394 characters
Back to the answer
# PEP 484 -- Type Hints - **Title:** Type Hints - **Author:** Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org>, Jukka Lehtosalo <jukka.lehtosalo@iki.fi>, Łukasz Langa <lukasz@python.org> - **Status:** Final - **Type:** Standards Track - **Created:** 29-Sep-2014 - **Python-Version:** 3.5 ## Abstract PEP 3107 introduced syntax for function annotations, but the semantics were deliberately left undefined. There has now been enough 3rd party usage for static type analysis that the community would benefit from a standard vocabulary and baseline tools within the standard library. This PEP introduces a provisional module to provide these standard definitions and tools, along with some conventions for situations where annotations are not available. Note that this PEP still explicitly does NOT prevent other uses of annotations, nor does it require (or forbid) any particular processing of annotations, even when they conform to this specification. It simply enables better coordination, as PEP 333 did for web frameworks. For example, here is a simple function whose argument and return type are declared in the annotations: def greeting(name: str) -> str: return 'Hello ' + name While these annotations are available at runtime through the usual `__annotations__` attribute, *no type checking happens at runtime*. Instead, the proposal assumes the existence of a separate off-line type checker which users can run over their source code voluntarily. Essentially, such a type checker acts as a very powerful linter. (While it would of course be possible for individual users to employ a similar checker at run time for Design By Contract enforcement or JIT optimization, those tools are not yet as mature.) The proposal is strongly inspired by mypy. For example, the type "sequence of integers" can be written as `Sequence[int]`. The square brackets mean that no new syntax needs to be added to the language. The example here uses a custom type `Sequence`, imported from a pure-Python module `typing`. The `Sequence[int]` notation works at runtime by implementing `__getitem__()` in the metaclass (but its significance is primarily to an offline type checker). The type system supports unions, generic types, and a special type named `Any` which is consistent with (i.e. assignable to and from) all types. This latter feature is taken from the idea of gradual typing. Gradual typing and the full type system are explained in PEP 483. Other approaches from which we have borrowed or to which ours can be compared and contrasted are described in PEP 482. ## Rationale and Goals PEP 3107 added support for arbitrary annotations on parts of a function definition. Although no meaning was assigned to annotations then, there has always been an implicit goal to use them for type hinting, which is listed as the first possible use case in said PEP. This PEP aims to provide a standard syntax for type annotations, opening up Python code to easier static analysis and refactoring, potential runtime type checking, and (perhaps, in some contexts) code generation utilizing type information. Of these goals, static analysis is the most important. This includes support for off-line type checkers such as mypy, as well as providing a standard notation that can be used by IDEs for code completion and refactoring. ### Non-goals While the proposed typing module will contain some building blocks for runtime type checking -- in particular the `get_type_hints()` function -- third party packages would have to be developed to implement specific runtime type checking functionality, for example using decorators or metaclasses. Using type hints for performance optimizations is left as an exercise for the reader. It should also be emphasized that **Python will remain a dynamically typed language, and the authors have no desire to ever make type hints mandatory, even by convention.** ## The meaning of annotations Any function without annotations should be treated as having the most general type possible, or ignored, by any type checker. Functions with the `@no_type_check` decorator should be treated as having no annotations. It is recommended but not required that checked functions have annotations for all arguments and the return type. For a checked function, the default annotation for arguments and for the return type is `Any`. An exception is the first argument of instance and class methods. If it is not annotated, then it is assumed to have the type of the containing class for instance methods, and a type object type corresponding to the containing class object for class methods. For example, in class `A` the first argument of an instance method has the implicit type `A`. In a class method, the precise type of the first argument cannot be represented using the available type notation. (Note that the return type of `__init__` ought to be annotated with `-> None`. The reason for this is subtle. If `__init__` assumed a return annotation of `-> None`, would that mean that an argument-less, un-annotated `__init__` method should still be type-checked? Rather than leaving this ambiguous or introducing an exception to the exception, we simply say that `__init__` ought to have a return annotation; the default behavior is thus the same as for other methods.) A type checker is expected to check the body of a checked function for consistency with the given annotations. The annotations may also be used to check correctness of calls appearing in other checked functions. Type checkers are expected to attempt to infer as much information as necessary. The minimum requirement is to handle the builtin decorators `@property`, `@staticmethod` and `@classmethod`. ## Type Definition Syntax The syntax leverages PEP 3107-style annotations with a number of extensions described in sections below. In its basic form, type hinting is used by filling function annotation slots with classes: def greeting(name: str) -> str: return 'Hello ' + name This states that the expected type of the `name` argument is `str`. Analogically, the expected return type is `str`. Expressions whose type is a subtype of a specific argument type are also accepted for that argument. ### Acceptable type hints Type hints may be built-in classes (including those defined in standard library or third-party extension modules), abstract base classes, types available in the `types` module, and user-defined classes (including those defined in the standard library or third-party modules). While annotations are normally the best format for type hints, there are times when it is more appropriate to represent them by a special comment, or in a separately distributed stub file. (See below for examples.) Annotations must be valid expressions that evaluate without raising exceptions at the time the function is defined (but see below for forward references). Annotations should be kept simple or static analysis tools may not be able to interpret the values. For example, dynamically computed types are unlikely to be understood. (This is an intentionally somewhat vague requirement, specific inclusions and exclusions may be added to future versions of this PEP as warranted by the discussion.) In addition to the above, the following special constructs defined below may be used: `None`, `Any`, `Union`, `Tuple`, `Callable`, all ABCs and stand-ins for concrete classes exported from `typing` (e.g. `Sequence` and `Dict`), type variables, and type aliases. All newly introduced names used to support features described in following sections (such as `Any` and `Union`) are available in the `typing` module. ### Using None When used in a type hint, the expression `None` is considered equivalent to `type(None)`. ### Type aliases Type aliases are defined by simple variable assignments: Url = str def retry(url: Url, retry_count: int) -> None: ... Note that we recommend capitalizing alias names, since they represent user-defined types, which (like user-defined classes) are typically spelled that way. Type aliases may be as complex as type hints in annotations -- anything that is acceptable as a type hint is acceptable in a type alias: from typing import TypeVar, Iterable, Tuple T = TypeVar('T', int, float, complex) Vector = Iterable[Tuple[T, T]] def inproduct(v: Vector[T]) -> T: return sum(x*y for x, y in v) def dilate(v: Vector[T], scale: T) -> Vector[T]: return ((x * scale, y * scale) for x, y in v) vec = [] # type: Vector[float] This is equivalent to: from typing import TypeVar, Iterable, Tuple T = TypeVar('T', int, float, complex) def inproduct(v: Iterable[Tuple[T, T]]) -> T: return sum(x*y for x, y in v) def dilate(v: Iterable[Tuple[T, T]], scale: T) -> Iterable[Tuple[T, T]]: return ((x * scale, y * scale) for x, y in v) vec = [] # type: Iterable[Tuple[float, float]] ### Callable Frameworks expecting callback functions of specific signatures might be type hinted using `Callable[[Arg1Type, Arg2Type], ReturnType]`. Examples: from typing import Callable def feeder(get_next_item: Callable[[], str]) -> None: # Body def async_query(on_success: Callable[[int], None], on_error: Callable[[int, Exception], None]) -> None: # Body It is possible to declare the return type of a callable without specifying the call signature by substituting a literal ellipsis (three dots) for the list of arguments: def partial(func: Callable[..., str], *args) -> Callable[..., str]: # Body Note that there are no square brackets around the ellipsis. The arguments of the callback are completely unconstrained in this case (and keyword arguments are acceptable). Since using callbacks with keyword arguments is not perceived as a common use case, there is currently no support for specifying keyword arguments with `Callable`. Similarly, there is no support for specifying callback signatures with a variable number of arguments of a specific type. Because `typing.Callable` does double-duty as a replacement for `collections.abc.Callable`, `isinstance(x, typing.Callable)` is implemented by deferring to `isinstance(x, collections.abc.Callable)`. However, `isinstance(x, typing.Callable[...])` is not supported. ### Generics Since type information about objects kept in containers cannot be statically inferred in a generic way, abstract base classes have been extended to support subscription to denote expected types for container elements. Example: from typing import Mapping, Set def notify_by_email(employees: Set[Employee], overrides: Mapping[str, str]) -> None: ... Generics can be parameterized by using a new factory available in `typing` called `TypeVar`. Example: from typing import Sequence, TypeVar T = TypeVar('T') # Declare type variable def first(l: Sequence[T]) -> T: # Generic function return l[0] In this case the contract is that the returned value is consistent with the elements held by the collection. A `TypeVar()` expression must always directly be assigned to a variable (it should not be used as part of a larger expression). The argument to `TypeVar()` must be a string equal to the variable name to which it is assigned. Type variables must not be redefined. `TypeVar` supports constraining parametric types to a fixed set of possible types (note: those types cannot be parameterized by type variables). For example, we can define a type variable that ranges over just `str` and `bytes`. By default, a type variable ranges over all possible types. Example of constraining a type variable: from typing import TypeVar, Text AnyStr = TypeVar('AnyStr', Text, bytes) def concat(x: AnyStr, y: AnyStr) -> AnyStr: return x + y The function `concat` can be called with either two `str` arguments or two `bytes` arguments, but not with a mix of `str` and `bytes` arguments. There should be at least two constraints, if any; specifying a single constraint is disallowed. Subtypes of types constrained by a type variable should be treated as their respective explicitly listed base types in the context of the type variable. Consider this example: class MyStr(str): ... x = concat(MyStr('apple'), MyStr('pie')) The call is valid but the type variable `AnyStr` will be set to `str` and not `MyStr`. In effect, the inferred type of the return value assigned to `x` will also be `str`. Additionally, `Any` is a valid value for every type variable. Consider the following: def count_truthy(elements: List[Any]) -> int: return sum(1 for elem in elements if elem) This is equivalent to omitting the generic notation and just saying `elements: List`. ### User-defined generic types You can include a `Generic` base class to define a user-defined class as generic. Example: from typing import TypeVar, Generic from logging import Logger T = TypeVar('T') class LoggedVar(Generic[T]): def __init__(self, value: T, name: str, logger: Logger) -> None: self.name = name self.logger = logger self.value = value def set(self, new: T) -> None: self.log('Set ' + repr(self.value)) self.value = new def get(self) -> T: self.log('Get ' + repr(self.value)) return self.value def log(self, message: str) -> None: self.logger.info('{}: {}'.format(self.name, message)) `Generic[T]` as a base class defines that the class `LoggedVar` takes a single type parameter `T`. This also makes `T` valid as a type within the class body. The `Generic` base class uses a metaclass that defines `__getitem__` so that `LoggedVar[t]` is valid as a type: from typing import Iterable def zero_all_vars(vars: Iterable[LoggedVar[int]]) -> None: for var in vars: var.set(0) A generic type can have any number of type variables, and type variables may be constrained. This is valid: from typing import TypeVar, Generic ... T = TypeVar('T') S = TypeVar('S') class Pair(Generic[T, S]): ... Each type variable argument to `Generic` must be distinct. This is thus invalid: from typing import TypeVar, Generic ... T = TypeVar('T') class Pair(Generic[T, T]): # INVALID ... The `Generic[T]` base class is redundant in simple cases where you subclass some other generic class and specify type variables for its parameters: from typing import TypeVar, Iterator T = TypeVar('T') class MyIter(Iterator[T]): ... That class definition is equivalent to: class MyIter(Iterator[T], Generic[T]): ... You can use multiple inheritance with `Generic`: from typing import TypeVar, Generic, Sized, Iterable, Container, Tuple T = TypeVar('T') class LinkedList(Sized, Generic[T]): ... K = TypeVar('K') V = TypeVar('V') class MyMapping(Iterable[Tuple[K, V]], Container[Tuple[K, V]], Generic[K, V]): ... Subclassing a generic class without specifying type parameters assumes `Any` for each position. In the following example, `MyIterable` is not generic but implicitly inherits from `Iterable[Any]`: from typing import Iterable class MyIterable(Iterable): # Same as Iterable[Any] ... Generic metaclasses are not supported. ### Scoping rules for type variables Type variables follow normal name resolution rules. However, there are some special cases in the static typechecking context: * A type variable used in a generic function could be inferred to represent different types in the same code block. Example: from typing import TypeVar, Generic T = TypeVar('T') def fun_1(x: T) -> T: ... # T here def fun_2(x: T) -> T: ... # and here could be different fun_1(1) # This is OK, T is inferred to be int fun_2('a') # This is also OK, now T is str * A type variable used in a method of a generic class that coincides with one of the variables that parameterize this class is always bound to that variable. Example: from typing import TypeVar, Generic T = TypeVar('T') class MyClass(Generic[T]): def meth_1(self, x: T) -> T: ... # T here def meth_2(self, x: T) -> T: ... # and here are always the same a = MyClass() # type: MyClass[int] a.meth_1(1) # OK a.meth_2('a') # This is an error! * A type variable used in a method that does not match any of the variables that parameterize the class makes this method a generic function in that variable: T = TypeVar('T') S = TypeVar('S') class Foo(Generic[T]): def method(self, x: T, y: S) -> S: ... x = Foo() # type: Foo[int] y = x.method(0, "abc") # inferred type of y is str * Unbound type variables should not appear in the bodies of generic functions, or in the class bodies apart from method definitions: T = TypeVar('T') S = TypeVar('S') def a_fun(x: T) -> None: # this is OK y = [] # type: List[T] # but below is an error! y = [] # type: List[S] class Bar(Generic[T]): # this is also an error an_attr = [] # type: List[S] def do_something(x: S) -> S: # this is OK though ... * A generic class definition that appears inside a generic function should not use type variables that parameterize the generic function: from typing import List def a_fun(x: T) -> None: # This is OK a_list = [] # type: List[T] ... # This is however illegal class MyGeneric(Generic[T]): ... * A generic class nested in another generic class cannot use same type variables. The scope of the type variables of the outer class doesn't cover the inner one: T = TypeVar('T') S = TypeVar('S') class Outer(Generic[T]): class Bad(Iterable[T]): # Error ... class AlsoBad: x = None # type: List[T] # Also an error class Inner(Iterable[S]): # OK ... attr = None # type: Inner[T] # Also OK ### Instantiating generic classes and type erasure User-defined generic classes can be instantiated. Suppose we write a `Node` class inheriting from `Generic[T]`: from typing import TypeVar, Generic T = TypeVar('T') class Node(Generic[T]): ... To create `Node` instances you call `Node()` just as for a regular class. At runtime the type (class) of the instance will be `Node`. But what type does it have to the type checker? The answer depends on how much information is available in the call. If the constructor (`__init__` or `__new__`) uses `T` in its signature, and a corresponding argument value is passed, the type of the corresponding argument(s) is substituted. Otherwise, `Any` is assumed. Example: from typing import TypeVar, Generic T = TypeVar('T') class Node(Generic[T]): x = None # type: T # Instance attribute (see below) def __init__(self, label: T = None) -> None: ... x = Node('') # Inferred type is Node[str] y = Node(0) # Inferred type is Node[int] z = Node() # Inferred type is Node[Any] In case the inferred type uses `[Any]` but the intended type is more specific, you can use a type comment (see below) to force the type of the variable, e.g.: # (continued from previous example) a = Node() # type: Node[int] b = Node() # type: Node[str] Alternatively, you can instantiate a specific concrete type, e.g.: # (continued from previous example) p = Node[int]() q = Node[str]() r = Node[int]('') # Error s = Node[str](0) # Error Note that the runtime type (class) of `p` and `q` is still just `Node` -- `Node[int]` and `Node[str]` are distinguishable class objects, but the runtime class of the objects created by instantiating them doesn't record the distinction. This behavior is called "type erasure"; it is common practice in languages with generics (e.g. Java, TypeScript). Using generic classes (parameterized or not) to access attributes will result in type check failure. Outside the class definition body, a class attribute cannot be assigned, and can only be looked up by accessing it through a class instance that does not have an instance attribute with the same name: # (continued from previous example) Node[int].x = 1 # Error Node[int].x # Error Node.x = 1 # Error Node.x # Error type(p).x # Error p.x # Ok (evaluates to None) Node[int]().x # Ok (evaluates to None) p.x = 1 # Ok, but assigning to instance attribute Generic versions of abstract collections like `Mapping` or `Sequence` and generic versions of built-in classes -- `List`, `Dict`, `Set`, and `FrozenSet` -- cannot be instantiated. However, concrete user-defined subclasses thereof and generic versions of concrete collections can be instantiated: data = DefaultDict[int, bytes]() Note that one should not confuse static types and runtime classes. The type is still erased in this case and the above expression is just a shorthand for: data = collections.defaultdict() # type: DefaultDict[int, bytes] It is not recommended to use the subscripted class (e.g. `Node[int]`) directly in an expression -- using a type alias (e.g. `IntNode = Node[int]`) instead is preferred. (First, creating the subscripted class, e.g. `Node[int]`, has a runtime cost. Second, using a type alias is more readable.) ### Arbitrary generic types as base classes `Generic[T]` is only valid as a base class -- it's not a proper type. However, user-defined generic types such as `LinkedList[T]` from the above example and built-in generic types and ABCs such as `List[T]` and `Iterable[T]` are valid both as types and as base classes. For example, we can define a subclass of `Dict` that specializes type arguments: from typing import Dict, List, Optional class Node: ... class SymbolTable(Dict[str, List[Node]]): def push(self, name: str, node: Node) -> None: self.setdefault(name, []).append(node) def pop(self, name: str) -> Node: return self[name].pop() def lookup(self, name: str) -> Optional[Node]: nodes = self.get(name) if nodes: return nodes[-1] return None `SymbolTable` is a subclass of `dict` and a subtype of `Dict[str, List[Node]]`. If a generic base class has a type variable as a type argument, this makes the defined class generic. For example, we can define a generic `LinkedList` class that is iterable and a container: from typing import TypeVar, Iterable, Container T = TypeVar('T') class LinkedList(Iterable[T], Container[T]): ... Now `LinkedList[int]` is a valid type. Note that we can use `T` multiple times in the base class list, as long as we don't use the same type variable `T` multiple times within `Generic[...]`. Also consider the following example: from typing import TypeVar, Mapping T = TypeVar('T') class MyDict(Mapping[str, T]): ... In this case MyDict has a single parameter, T. ### Abstract generic types The metaclass used by `Generic` is a subclass of `abc.ABCMeta`. A generic class can be an ABC by including abstract methods or properties, and generic classes can also have ABCs as base classes without a metaclass conflict. ### Type variables with an upper bound A type variable may specify an upper bound using `bound=<type>` (note: <type> itself cannot be parameterized by type variables). This means that an actual type substituted (explicitly or implicitly) for the type variable must be a subtype of the boundary type. Example: from typing import TypeVar, Sized ST = TypeVar('ST', bound=Sized) def longer(x: ST, y: ST) -> ST: if len(x) > len(y): return x else: return y longer([1], [1, 2]) # ok, return type List[int] longer({1}, {1, 2}) # ok, return type Set[int] longer([1], {1, 2}) # ok, return type Collection[int] An upper bound cannot be combined with type constraints (as in used `AnyStr`, see the example earlier); type constraints cause the inferred type to be _exactly_ one of the constraint types, while an upper bound just requires that the actual type is a subtype of the boundary type. ### Covariance and contravariance Consider a class `Employee` with a subclass `Manager`. Now suppose we have a function with an argument annotated with `List[Employee]`. Should we be allowed to call this function with a variable of type `List[Manager]` as its argument? Many people would answer "yes, of course" without even considering the consequences. But unless we know more about the function, a type checker should reject such a call: the function might append an `Employee` instance to the list, which would violate the variable's type in the caller. It turns out such an argument acts *contravariantly*, whereas the intuitive answer (which is correct in case the function doesn't mutate its argument!) requires the argument to act *covariantly*. A longer introduction to these concepts can be found on Wikipedia and in PEP 483; here we just show how to control a type checker's behavior. By default generic types are considered *invariant* in all type variables, which means that values for variables annotated with types like `List[Employee]` must exactly match the type annotation -- no subclasses or superclasses of the type parameter (in this example `Employee`) are allowed. To facilitate the declaration of container types where covariant or contravariant type checking is acceptable, type variables accept keyword arguments `covariant=True` or `contravariant=True`. At most one of these may be passed. Generic types defined with such variables are considered covariant or contravariant in the corresponding variable. By convention, it is recommended to use names ending in `_co` for type variables defined with `covariant=True` and names ending in `_contra` for that defined with `contravariant=True`. A typical example involves defining an immutable (or read-only) container class: from typing import TypeVar, Generic, Iterable, Iterator T_co = TypeVar('T_co', covariant=True) class ImmutableList(Generic[T_co]): def __init__(self, items: Iterable[T_co]) -> None: ... def __iter__(self) -> Iterator[T_co]: ... ... class Employee: ... class Manager(Employee): ... def dump_employees(emps: ImmutableList[Employee]) -> None: for emp in emps: ... mgrs = ImmutableList([Manager()]) # type: ImmutableList[Manager] dump_employees(mgrs) # OK The read-only collection classes in `typing` are all declared covariant in their type variable (e.g. `Mapping` and `Sequence`). The mutable collection classes (e.g. `MutableMapping` and `MutableSequence`) are declared invariant. The one example of a contravariant type is the `Generator` type, which is contravariant in the `send()` argument type (see below). Note: Covariance or contravariance is *not* a property of a type variable, but a property of a generic class defined using this variable. Variance is only applicable to generic types; generic functions do not have this property. The latter should be defined using only type variables without `covariant` or `contravariant` keyword arguments. For example, the following example is fine: from typing import TypeVar class Employee: ... class Manager(Employee): ... E = TypeVar('E', bound=Employee) def dump_employee(e: E) -> None: ... dump_employee(Manager()) # OK while the following is prohibited: B_co = TypeVar('B_co', covariant=True) def bad_func(x: B_co) -> B_co: # Flagged as error by a type checker ... ### The numeric tower PEP 3141 defines Python's numeric tower, and the stdlib module `numbers` implements the corresponding ABCs (`Number`, `Complex`, `Real`, `Rational` and `Integral`). There are some issues with these ABCs, but the built-in concrete numeric classes `complex`, `float` and `int` are ubiquitous (especially the latter two :-). Rather than requiring that users write `import numbers` and then use `numbers.Float` etc., this PEP proposes a straightforward shortcut that is almost as effective: when an argument is annotated as having type `float`, an argument of type `int` is acceptable; similar, for an argument annotated as having type `complex`, arguments of type `float` or `int` are acceptable. This does not handle classes implementing the corresponding ABCs or the `fractions.Fraction` class, but we believe those use cases are exceedingly rare. ### Forward references When a type hint contains names that have not been defined yet, that definition may be expressed as a string literal, to be resolved later. A situation where this occurs commonly is the definition of a container class, where the class being defined occurs in the signature of some of the methods. For example, the following code (the start of a simple binary tree implementation) does not work: class Tree: def __init__(self, left: Tree, right: Tree): self.left = left self.right = right To address this, we write: class Tree: def __init__(self, left: 'Tree', right: 'Tree'): self.left = left self.right = right The string literal should contain a valid Python expression (i.e., `compile(lit, '', 'eval')` should be a valid code object) and it should evaluate without errors once the module has been fully loaded. The local and global namespace in which it is evaluated should be the same namespaces in which default arguments to the same function would be evaluated. Moreover, the expression should be parseable as a valid type hint, i.e., it is constrained by the rules from the section Acceptable type hints above. It is allowable to use string literals as *part* of a type hint, for example: class Tree: ... def leaves(self) -> List['Tree']: ... A common use for forward references is when e.g. Django models are needed in the signatures. Typically, each model is in a separate file, and has methods taking arguments whose type involves other models. Because of the way circular imports work in Python, it is often not possible to import all the needed models directly: # File models/a.py from models.b import B class A(Model): def foo(self, b: B): ... # File models/b.py from models.a import A class B(Model): def bar(self, a: A): ... # File main.py from models.a import A from models.b import B Assuming main is imported first, this will fail with an ImportError at the line `from models.a import A` in models/b.py, which is being imported from models/a.py before a has defined class A. The solution is to switch to module-only imports and reference the models by their _module_._class_ name: # File models/a.py from models import b class A(Model): def foo(self, b: 'b.B'): ... # File models/b.py from models import a class B(Model): def bar(self, a: 'a.A'): ... # File main.py from models.a import A from models.b import B ### Union types Since accepting a small, limited set of expected types for a single argument is common, there is a new special factory called `Union`. Example: from typing import Union def handle_employees(e: Union[Employee, Sequence[Employee]]) -> None: if isinstance(e, Employee): e = [e] ... A type factored by `Union[T1, T2, ...]` is a supertype of all types `T1`, `T2`, etc., so that a value that is a member of one of these types is acceptable for an argument annotated by `Union[T1, T2, ...]`. One common case of union types are *optional* types. By default, `None` is an invalid value for any type, unless a default value of `None` has been provided in the function definition. Examples: def handle_employee(e: Union[Employee, None]) -> None: ... As a shorthand for `Union[T1, None]` you can write `Optional[T1]`; for example, the above is equivalent to: from typing import Optional def handle_employee(e: Optional[Employee]) -> None: ... A past version of this PEP allowed type checkers to assume an optional type when the default value is `None`, as in this code: def handle_employee(e: Employee = None): ... This would have been treated as equivalent to: def handle_employee(e: Optional[Employee] = None) -> None: ... This is no longer the recommended behavior. Type checkers should move towards requiring the optional type to be made explicit. ### Support for singleton types in unions A singleton instance is frequently used to mark some special condition, in particular in situations where `None` is also a valid value for a variable. Example: _empty = object() def func(x=_empty): if x is _empty: # default argument value return 0 elif x is None: # argument was provided and it's None return 1 else: return x * 2 To allow precise typing in such situations, the user should use the `Union` type in conjunction with the `enum.Enum` class provided by the standard library, so that type errors can be caught statically: from typing import Union from enum import Enum class Empty(Enum): token = 0 _empty = Empty.token def func(x: Union[int, None, Empty] = _empty) -> int: boom = x * 42 # This fails type check if x is _empty: return 0 elif x is None: return 1 else: # At this point typechecker knows that x can only have type int return x * 2 Since the subclasses of `Enum` cannot be further subclassed, the type of variable `x` can be statically inferred in all branches of the above example. The same approach is applicable if more than one singleton object is needed: one can use an enumeration that has more than one value: class Reason(Enum): timeout = 1 error = 2 def process(response: Union[str, Reason] = '') -> str: if response is Reason.timeout: return 'TIMEOUT' elif response is Reason.error: return 'ERROR' else: # response can be only str, all other possible values exhausted return 'PROCESSED: ' + response ### The `Any` type A special kind of type is `Any`. Every type is consistent with `Any`. It can be considered a type that has all values and all methods. Note that `Any` and builtin type `object` are completely different. When the type of a value is `object`, the type checker will reject almost all operations on it, and assigning it to a variable (or using it as a return value) of a more specialized type is a type error. On the other hand, when a value has type `Any`, the type checker will allow all operations on it, and a value of type `Any` can be assigned to a variable (or used as a return value) of a more constrained type. A function parameter without an annotation is assumed to be annotated with `Any`. If a generic type is used without specifying type parameters, they are assumed to be `Any`: from typing import Mapping def use_map(m: Mapping) -> None: # Same as Mapping[Any, Any] ... This rule also applies to `Tuple`, in annotation context it is equivalent to `Tuple[Any, ...]` and, in turn, to `tuple`. As well, a bare `Callable` in an annotation is equivalent to `Callable[..., Any]` and, in turn, to `collections.abc.Callable`: from typing import Tuple, List, Callable def check_args(args: Tuple) -> bool: ... check_args(()) # OK check_args((42, 'abc')) # Also OK check_args(3.14) # Flagged as error by a type checker # A list of arbitrary callables is accepted by this function def apply_callbacks(cbs: List[Callable]) -> None: ... ### The `NoReturn` type The `typing` module provides a special type `NoReturn` to annotate functions that never return normally. For example, a function that unconditionally raises an exception: from typing import NoReturn def stop() -> NoReturn: raise RuntimeError('no way') The `NoReturn` annotation is used for functions such as `sys.exit`. Static type checkers will ensure that functions annotated as returning `NoReturn` truly never return, either implicitly or explicitly: import sys from typing import NoReturn def f(x: int) -> NoReturn: # Error, f(0) implicitly returns None if x != 0: sys.exit(1) The checkers will also recognize that the code after calls to such functions is unreachable and will behave accordingly: # continue from first example def g(x: int) -> int: if x > 0: return x stop() return 'whatever works' # Error might be not reported by some checkers # that ignore errors in unreachable blocks The `NoReturn` type is only valid as a return annotation of functions, and considered an error if it appears in other positions: from typing import List, NoReturn # All of the following are errors def bad1(x: NoReturn) -> int: ... bad2 = None # type: NoReturn def bad3() -> List[NoReturn]: ... ### The type of class objects Sometimes you want to talk about class objects, in particular class objects that inherit from a given class. This can be spelled as `Type[C]` where `C` is a class. To clarify: while `C` (when used as an annotation) refers to instances of class `C`, `Type[C]` refers to *subclasses* of `C`. (This is a similar distinction as between `object` and `type`.) For example, suppose we have the following classes: class User: ... # Abstract base for User classes class BasicUser(User): ... class ProUser(User): ... class TeamUser(User): ... And suppose we have a function that creates an instance of one of these classes if you pass it a class object: def new_user(user_class): user = user_class() # (Here we could write the user object to a database) return user Without `Type[]` the best we could do to annotate `new_user()` would be: def new_user(user_class: type) -> User: ... However using `Type[]` and a type variable with an upper bound we can do much better: U = TypeVar('U', bound=User) def new_user(user_class: Type[U]) -> U: ... Now when we call `new_user()` with a specific subclass of `User` a type checker will infer the correct type of the result: joe = new_user(BasicUser) # Inferred type is BasicUser The value corresponding to `Type[C]` must be an actual class object that's a subtype of `C`, not a special form. In other words, in the above example calling e.g. `new_user(Union[BasicUser, ProUser])` is rejected by the type checker (in addition to failing at runtime because you can't instantiate a union). Note that it is legal to use a union of classes as the parameter for `Type[]`, as in: def new_non_team_user(user_class: Type[Union[BasicUser, ProUser]]): user = new_user(user_class) ... However the actual argument passed in at runtime must still be a concrete class object, e.g. in the above example: new_non_team_user(ProUser) # OK new_non_team_user(TeamUser) # Disallowed by type checker `Type[Any]` is also supported (see below for its meaning). `Type[T]` where `T` is a type variable is allowed when annotating the first argument of a class method (see the relevant section). Any other special constructs like `Tuple` or `Callable` are not allowed as an argument to `Type`. There are some concerns with this feature: for example when `new_user()` calls `user_class()` this implies that all subclasses of `User` must support this in their constructor signature. However this is not unique to `Type[]`: class methods have similar concerns. A type checker ought to flag violations of such assumptions, but by default constructor calls that match the constructor signature in the indicated base class (`User` in the example above) should be allowed. A program containing a complex or extensible class hierarchy might also handle this by using a factory class method. A future revision of this PEP may introduce better ways of dealing with these concerns. When `Type` is parameterized it requires exactly one parameter. Plain `Type` without brackets is equivalent to `Type[Any]` and this in turn is equivalent to `type` (the root of Python's metaclass hierarchy). This equivalence also motivates the name, `Type`, as opposed to alternatives like `Class` or `SubType`, which were proposed while this feature was under discussion; this is similar to the relationship between e.g. `List` and `list`. Regarding the behavior of `Type[Any]` (or `Type` or `type`), accessing attributes of a variable with this type only provides attributes and methods defined by `type` (for example, `__repr__()` and `__mro__`). Such a variable can be called with arbitrary arguments, and the return type is `Any`. `Type` is covariant in its parameter, because `Type[Derived]` is a subtype of `Type[Base]`: def new_pro_user(pro_user_class: Type[ProUser]): user = new_user(pro_user_class) # OK ... ### Annotating instance and class methods In most cases the first argument of class and instance methods does not need to be annotated, and it is assumed to have the type of the containing class for instance methods, and a type object type corresponding to the containing class object for class methods. In addition, the first argument in an instance method can be annotated with a type variable. In this case the return type may use the same type variable, thus making that method a generic function. For example: T = TypeVar('T', bound='Copyable') class Copyable: def copy(self: T) -> T: # return a copy of self class C(Copyable): ... c = C() c2 = c.copy() # type here should be C The same applies to class methods using `Type[]` in an annotation of the first argument: T = TypeVar('T', bound='C') class C: @classmethod def factory(cls: Type[T]) -> T: # make a new instance of cls class D(C): ... d = D.factory() # type here should be D Note that some type checkers may apply restrictions on this use, such as requiring an appropriate upper bound for the type variable used (see examples). ### Version and platform checking Type checkers are expected to understand simple version and platform checks, e.g.: import sys if sys.version_info[0] >= 3: # Python 3 specific definitions else: # Python 2 specific definitions if sys.platform == 'win32': # Windows specific definitions else: # Posix specific definitions Don't expect a checker to understand obfuscations like `"".join(reversed(sys.platform)) == "xunil"`. ### Runtime or type checking? Sometimes there's code that must be seen by a type checker (or other static analysis tools) but should not be executed. For such situations the `typing` module defines a constant, `TYPE_CHECKING`, that is considered `True` during type checking (or other static analysis) but `False` at runtime. Example: import typing if typing.TYPE_CHECKING: import expensive_mod def a_func(arg: 'expensive_mod.SomeClass') -> None: a_var = arg # type: expensive_mod.SomeClass ... (Note that the type annotation must be enclosed in quotes, making it a "forward reference", to hide the `expensive_mod` reference from the interpreter runtime. In the `# type` comment no quotes are needed.) This approach may also be useful to handle import cycles. ### Arbitrary argument lists and default argument values Arbitrary argument lists can as well be type annotated, so that the definition: def foo(*args: str, **kwds: int): ... is acceptable and it means that, e.g., all of the following represent function calls with valid types of arguments: foo('a', 'b', 'c') foo(x=1, y=2) foo('', z=0) In the body of function `foo`, the type of variable `args` is deduced as `Tuple[str, ...]` and the type of variable `kwds` is `Dict[str, int]`. In stubs it may be useful to declare an argument as having a default without specifying the actual default value. For example: def foo(x: AnyStr, y: AnyStr = ...) -> AnyStr: ... What should the default value look like? Any of the options `""`, `b""` or `None` fails to satisfy the type constraint. In such cases the default value may be specified as a literal ellipsis, i.e. the above example is literally what you would write. ### Positional-only arguments Some functions are designed to take their arguments only positionally, and expect their callers never to use the argument's name to provide that argument by keyword. All arguments with names beginning with `__` are assumed to be positional-only, except if their names also end with `__`: def quux(__x: int, __y__: int = 0) -> None: ... quux(3, __y__=1) # This call is fine. quux(__x=3) # This call is an error. ### Annotating generator functions and coroutines The return type of generator functions can be annotated by the generic type ``Generator[yield_type, send_type, return_type]` provided by `typing.py`` module: def echo_round() -> Generator[int, float, str]: res = yield while res: res = yield round(res) return 'OK' Coroutines introduced in PEP 492 are annotated with the same syntax as ordinary functions. However, the return type annotation corresponds to the type of `await` expression, not to the coroutine type: async def spam(ignored: int) -> str: return 'spam' async def foo() -> None: bar = await spam(42) # type: str The `typing.py` module provides a generic version of ABC `collections.abc.Coroutine` to specify awaitables that also support `send()` and `throw()` methods. The variance and order of type variables correspond to those of `Generator`, namely `Coroutine[T_co, T_contra, V_co]`, for example: from typing import List, Coroutine c = None # type: Coroutine[List[str], str, int] ... x = c.send('hi') # type: List[str] async def bar() -> None: x = await c # type: int The module also provides generic ABCs `Awaitable`, `AsyncIterable`, and `AsyncIterator` for situations where more precise types cannot be specified: def op() -> typing.Awaitable[str]: if cond: return spam(42) else: return asyncio.Future(...) ## Compatibility with other uses of function annotations A number of existing or potential use cases for function annotations exist, which are incompatible with type hinting. These may confuse a static type checker. However, since type hinting annotations have no runtime behavior (other than evaluation of the annotation expression and storing annotations in the `__annotations__` attribute of the function object), this does not make the program incorrect -- it just may cause a type checker to emit spurious warnings or errors. To mark portions of the program that should not be covered by type hinting, you can use one or more of the following: * a `# type: ignore` comment; * a `@no_type_check` decorator on a class or function; * a custom class or function decorator marked with `@no_type_check_decorator`. For more details see later sections. In order for maximal compatibility with offline type checking it may eventually be a good idea to change interfaces that rely on annotations to switch to a different mechanism, for example a decorator. In Python 3.5 there is no pressure to do this, however. See also the longer discussion under Rejected alternatives below. ## Type comments No first-class syntax support for explicitly marking variables as being of a specific type is added by this PEP. To help with type inference in complex cases, a comment of the following format may be used: x = [] # type: List[Employee] x, y, z = [], [], [] # type: List[int], List[int], List[str] x, y, z = [], [], [] # type: (List[int], List[int], List[str]) a, b, *c = range(5) # type: float, float, List[float] x = [1, 2] # type: List[int] Type comments should be put on the last line of the statement that contains the variable definition. They can also be placed on `with` statements and `for` statements, right after the colon. Examples of type comments on `with` and `for` statements: with frobnicate() as foo: # type: int # Here foo is an int ... for x, y in points: # type: float, float # Here x and y are floats ... In stubs it may be useful to declare the existence of a variable without giving it an initial value. This can be done using PEP 526 variable annotation syntax: from typing import IO stream: IO[str] The above syntax is acceptable in stubs for all versions of Python. However, in non-stub code for versions of Python 3.5 and earlier there is a special case: from typing import IO stream = None # type: IO[str] Type checkers should not complain about this (despite the value `None` not matching the given type), nor should they change the inferred type to `Optional[...]` (despite the rule that does this for annotated arguments with a default value of `None`). The assumption here is that other code will ensure that the variable is given a value of the proper type, and all uses can assume that the variable has the given type. The `# type: ignore` comment should be put on the line that the error refers to: import http.client errors = { 'not_found': http.client.NOT_FOUND # type: ignore } A `# type: ignore` comment on a line by itself at the top of a file, before any docstrings, imports, or other executable code, silences all errors in the file. Blank lines and other comments, such as shebang lines and coding cookies, may precede the `# type: ignore` comment. In some cases, linting tools or other comments may be needed on the same line as a type comment. In these cases, the type comment should be before other comments and linting markers: # type: ignore # <comment or other marker> If type hinting proves useful in general, a syntax for typing variables may be provided in a future Python version. (**UPDATE**: This syntax was added in Python 3.6 through PEP 526.) ## Casts Occasionally the type checker may need a different kind of hint: the programmer may know that an expression is of a more constrained type than a type checker may be able to infer. For example: from typing import List, cast def find_first_str(a: List[object]) -> str: index = next(i for i, x in enumerate(a) if isinstance(x, str)) # We only get here if there's at least one string in a return cast(str, a[index]) Some type checkers may not be able to infer that the type of `a[index]` is `str` and only infer `object` or `Any`, but we know that (if the code gets to that point) it must be a string. The `cast(t, x)` call tells the type checker that we are confident that the type of `x` is `t`. At runtime a cast always returns the expression unchanged -- it does not check the type, and it does not convert or coerce the value. Casts differ from type comments (see the previous section). When using a type comment, the type checker should still verify that the inferred type is consistent with the stated type. When using a cast, the type checker should blindly believe the programmer. Also, casts can be used in expressions, while type comments only apply to assignments. ## NewType helper function There are also situations where a programmer might want to avoid logical errors by creating simple classes. For example: class UserId(int): pass def get_by_user_id(user_id: UserId): ... However, this approach introduces a runtime overhead. To avoid this, `typing.py` provides a helper function `NewType` that creates simple unique types with almost zero runtime overhead. For a static type checker `Derived = NewType('Derived', Base)` is roughly equivalent to a definition: class Derived(Base): def __init__(self, _x: Base) -> None: ... While at runtime, `NewType('Derived', Base)` returns a dummy function that simply returns its argument. Type checkers require explicit casts from `int` where `UserId` is expected, while implicitly casting from `UserId` where `int` is expected. Examples: UserId = NewType('UserId', int) def name_by_id(user_id: UserId) -> str: ... UserId('user') # Fails type check name_by_id(42) # Fails type check name_by_id(UserId(42)) # OK num = UserId(5) + 1 # type: int `NewType` accepts exactly two arguments: a name for the new unique type, and a base class. The latter should be a proper class (i.e., not a type construct like `Union`, etc.), or another unique type created by calling `NewType`. The function returned by `NewType` accepts only one argument; this is equivalent to supporting only one constructor accepting an instance of the base class (see above). Example: class PacketId: def __init__(self, major: int, minor: int) -> None: self._major = major self._minor = minor TcpPacketId = NewType('TcpPacketId', PacketId) packet = PacketId(100, 100) tcp_packet = TcpPacketId(packet) # OK tcp_packet = TcpPacketId(127, 0) # Fails in type checker and at runtime Both `isinstance` and `issubclass`, as well as subclassing will fail for `NewType('Derived', Base)` since function objects don't support these operations. ## Stub Files Stub files are files containing type hints that are only for use by the type checker, not at runtime. There are several use cases for stub files: * Extension modules * Third-party modules whose authors have not yet added type hints * Standard library modules for which type hints have not yet been written * Modules that must be compatible with Python 2 and 3 * Modules that use annotations for other purposes Stub files have the same syntax as regular Python modules. There is one feature of the `typing` module that is different in stub files: the `@overload` decorator described below. The type checker should only check function signatures in stub files; It is recommended that function bodies in stub files just be a single ellipsis (`...`). The type checker should have a configurable search path for stub files. If a stub file is found the type checker should not read the corresponding "real" module. While stub files are syntactically valid Python modules, they use the `.pyi` extension to make it possible to maintain stub files in the same directory as the corresponding real module. This also reinforces the notion that no runtime behavior should be expected of stub files. Additional notes on stub files: * Modules and variables imported into the stub are not considered exported from the stub unless the import uses the ``import ... as ...` form or the equivalent `from ... import ... as ...`` form. (*UPDATE:* To clarify, the intention here is that only names imported using the form `X as X` will be exported, i.e. the name before and after `as` must be the same.) * However, as an exception to the previous bullet, all objects imported into a stub using `from ... import *` are considered exported. (This makes it easier to re-export all objects from a given module that may vary by Python version.) * Just like in normal Python files, submodules automatically become exported attributes of their parent module when imported. For example, if the `spam` package has the following directory structure: spam/ __init__.pyi ham.pyi where `__init__.pyi` contains a line such as `from . import ham` or `from .ham import Ham`, then `ham` is an exported attribute of `spam`. * Stub files may be incomplete. To make type checkers aware of this, the file can contain the following code: def __getattr__(name) -> Any: ... Any identifier not defined in the stub is therefore assumed to be of type `Any`. ### Function/method overloading The `@overload` decorator allows describing functions and methods that support multiple different combinations of argument types. This pattern is used frequently in builtin modules and types. For example, the `__getitem__()` method of the `bytes` type can be described as follows: from typing import overload class bytes: ... @overload def __getitem__(self, i: int) -> int: ... @overload def __getitem__(self, s: slice) -> bytes: ... This description is more precise than would be possible using unions (which cannot express the relationship between the argument and return types): from typing import Union class bytes: ... def __getitem__(self, a: Union[int, slice]) -> Union[int, bytes]: ... Another example where `@overload` comes in handy is the type of the builtin `map()` function, which takes a different number of arguments depending on the type of the callable: from typing import Callable, Iterable, Iterator, Tuple, TypeVar, overload T1 = TypeVar('T1') T2 = TypeVar('T2') S = TypeVar('S') @overload def map(func: Callable[[T1], S], iter1: Iterable[T1]) -> Iterator[S]: ... @overload def map(func: Callable[[T1, T2], S], iter1: Iterable[T1], iter2: Iterable[T2]) -> Iterator[S]: ... # ... and we could add more items to support more than two iterables Note that we could also easily add items to support `map(None, ...)`: @overload def map(func: None, iter1: Iterable[T1]) -> Iterable[T1]: ... @overload def map(func: None, iter1: Iterable[T1], iter2: Iterable[T2]) -> Iterable[Tuple[T1, T2]]: ... Uses of the `@overload` decorator as shown above are suitable for stub files. In regular modules, a series of `@overload`-decorated definitions must be followed by exactly one non-`@overload`-decorated definition (for the same function/method). The `@overload`-decorated definitions are for the benefit of the type checker only, since they will be overwritten by the non-`@overload`-decorated definition, while the latter is used at runtime but should be ignored by a type checker. At runtime, calling a `@overload`-decorated function directly will raise `NotImplementedError`. Here's an example of a non-stub overload that can't easily be expressed using a union or a type variable: @overload def utf8(value: None) -> None: pass @overload def utf8(value: bytes) -> bytes: pass @overload def utf8(value: unicode) -> bytes: pass def utf8(value): <actual implementation> NOTE: While it would be possible to provide a multiple dispatch implementation using this syntax, its implementation would require using `sys._getframe()`, which is frowned upon. Also, designing and implementing an efficient multiple dispatch mechanism is hard, which is why previous attempts were abandoned in favor of `functools.singledispatch()`. (See PEP 443, especially its section "Alternative approaches".) In the future we may come up with a satisfactory multiple dispatch design, but we don't want such a design to be constrained by the overloading syntax defined for type hints in stub files. It is also possible that both features will develop independent from each other (since overloading in the type checker has different use cases and requirements than multiple dispatch at runtime -- e.g. the latter is unlikely to support generic types). A constrained `TypeVar` type can often be used instead of using the `@overload` decorator. For example, the definitions of `concat1` and `concat2` in this stub file are equivalent: from typing import TypeVar, Text AnyStr = TypeVar('AnyStr', Text, bytes) def concat1(x: AnyStr, y: AnyStr) -> AnyStr: ... @overload def concat2(x: str, y: str) -> str: ... @overload def concat2(x: bytes, y: bytes) -> bytes: ... Some functions, such as `map` or `bytes.__getitem__` above, can't be represented precisely using type variables. However, unlike `@overload`, type variables can also be used outside stub files. We recommend that `@overload` is only used in cases where a type variable is not sufficient, due to its special stub-only status. Another important difference between type variables such as `AnyStr` and using `@overload` is that the prior can also be used to define constraints for generic class type parameters. For example, the type parameter of the generic class `typing.IO` is constrained (only `IO[str]`, `IO[bytes]` and `IO[Any]` are valid): class IO(Generic[AnyStr]): ... ### Storing and distributing stub files The easiest form of stub file storage and distribution is to put them alongside Python modules in the same directory. This makes them easy to find by both programmers and the tools. However, since package maintainers are free not to add type hinting to their packages, third-party stubs installable by `pip` from PyPI are also supported. In this case we have to consider three issues: naming, versioning, installation path. This PEP does not provide a recommendation on a naming scheme that should be used for third-party stub file packages. Discoverability will hopefully be based on package popularity, like with Django packages for example. Third-party stubs have to be versioned using the lowest version of the source package that is compatible. Example: FooPackage has versions 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2. There are API changes in versions 1.1, 2.0 and 2.2. The stub file package maintainer is free to release stubs for all versions but at least 1.0, 1.1, 2.0 and 2.2 are needed to enable the end user type check all versions. This is because the user knows that the closest *lower or equal* version of stubs is compatible. In the provided example, for FooPackage 1.3 the user would choose stubs version 1.1. Note that if the user decides to use the "latest" available source package, using the "latest" stub files should generally also work if they're updated often. Third-party stub packages can use any location for stub storage. Type checkers should search for them using PYTHONPATH. A default fallback directory that is always checked is `shared/typehints/pythonX.Y/` (for some PythonX.Y as determined by the type checker, not just the installed version). Since there can only be one package installed for a given Python version per environment, no additional versioning is performed under that directory (just like bare directory installs by `pip` in site-packages). Stub file package authors might use the following snippet in `setup.py`: ... data_files=[ ( 'shared/typehints/python{}.{}'.format(*sys.version_info[:2]), pathlib.Path(SRC_PATH).glob('**/*.pyi'), ), ], ... (*UPDATE:* As of June 2018 the recommended way to distribute type hints for third-party packages has changed -- in addition to typeshed (see the next section) there is now a standard for distributing type hints, PEP 561. It supports separately installable packages containing stubs, stub files included in the same distribution as the executable code of a package, and inline type hints, the latter two options enabled by including a file named `py.typed` in the package.) ### The Typeshed Repo There is a shared repository where useful stubs are being collected. Policies regarding the stubs collected here will be decided separately and reported in the repo's documentation. Note that stubs for a given package will not be included here if the package owners have specifically requested that they be omitted. ## Exceptions No syntax for listing explicitly raised exceptions is proposed. Currently the only known use case for this feature is documentational, in which case the recommendation is to put this information in a docstring. ## The `typing` Module To open the usage of static type checking to Python 3.5 as well as older versions, a uniform namespace is required. For this purpose, a new module in the standard library is introduced called `typing`. It defines the fundamental building blocks for constructing types (e.g. `Any`), types representing generic variants of builtin collections (e.g. `List`), types representing generic collection ABCs (e.g. `Sequence`), and a small collection of convenience definitions. Note that special type constructs, such as `Any`, `Union`, and type variables defined using `TypeVar` are only supported in the type annotation context, and `Generic` may only be used as a base class. All of these (except for unparameterized generics) will raise `TypeError` if appear in `isinstance` or `issubclass`. Fundamental building blocks: * Any, used as `def get(key: str) -> Any: ...` * Union, used as `Union[Type1, Type2, Type3]` * Callable, used as `Callable[[Arg1Type, Arg2Type], ReturnType]` * Tuple, used by listing the element types, for example `Tuple[int, int, str]`. The empty tuple can be typed as `Tuple[()]`. Arbitrary-length homogeneous tuples can be expressed using one type and ellipsis, for example `Tuple[int, ...]`. (The `...` here are part of the syntax, a literal ellipsis.) * TypeVar, used as `X = TypeVar('X', Type1, Type2, Type3)` or simply `Y = TypeVar('Y')` (see above for more details) * Generic, used to create user-defined generic classes * Type, used to annotate class objects Generic variants of builtin collections: * Dict, used as `Dict[key_type, value_type]` * DefaultDict, used as `DefaultDict[key_type, value_type]`, a generic variant of `collections.defaultdict` * List, used as `List[element_type]` * Set, used as `Set[element_type]`. See remark for `AbstractSet` below. * FrozenSet, used as `FrozenSet[element_type]` Note: `Dict`, `DefaultDict`, `List`, `Set` and `FrozenSet` are mainly useful for annotating return values. For arguments, prefer the abstract collection types defined below, e.g. `Mapping`, `Sequence` or `AbstractSet`. Generic variants of container ABCs (and a few non-containers): * Awaitable * AsyncIterable * AsyncIterator * ByteString * Callable (see above, listed here for completeness) * Collection * Container * ContextManager * Coroutine * Generator, used as `Generator[yield_type, send_type, return_type]`. This represents the return value of generator functions. It is a subtype of `Iterable` and it has additional type variables for the type accepted by the `send()` method (it is contravariant in this variable -- a generator that accepts sending it `Employee` instance is valid in a context where a generator is required that accepts sending it `Manager` instances) and the return type of the generator. * Hashable (not generic, but present for completeness) * ItemsView * Iterable * Iterator * KeysView * Mapping * MappingView * MutableMapping * MutableSequence * MutableSet * Sequence * Set, renamed to `AbstractSet`. This name change was required because `Set` in the `typing` module means `set()` with generics. * Sized (not generic, but present for completeness) * ValuesView A few one-off types are defined that test for single special methods (similar to `Hashable` or `Sized`): * Reversible, to test for `__reversed__` * SupportsAbs, to test for `__abs__` * SupportsComplex, to test for `__complex__` * SupportsFloat, to test for `__float__` * SupportsInt, to test for `__int__` * SupportsRound, to test for `__round__` * SupportsBytes, to test for `__bytes__` Convenience definitions: * Optional, defined by `Optional[t] == Union[t, None]` * Text, a simple alias for `str` in Python 3, for `unicode` in Python 2 * AnyStr, defined as `TypeVar('AnyStr', Text, bytes)` * NamedTuple, used as `NamedTuple(type_name, [(field_name, field_type), ...])` and equivalent to `collections.namedtuple(type_name, [field_name, ...])`. This is useful to declare the types of the fields of a named tuple type. * NewType, used to create unique types with little runtime overhead `UserId = NewType('UserId', int)` * cast(), described earlier * @no_type_check, a decorator to disable type checking per class or function (see below) * @no_type_check_decorator, a decorator to create your own decorators with the same meaning as `@no_type_check` (see below) * @type_check_only, a decorator only available during type checking for use in stub files (see above); marks a class or function as unavailable during runtime * @overload, described earlier * get_type_hints(), a utility function to retrieve the type hints from a function or method. Given a function or method object, it returns a dict with the same format as `__annotations__`, but evaluating forward references (which are given as string literals) as expressions in the context of the original function or method definition. * TYPE_CHECKING, `False` at runtime but `True` to type checkers I/O related types: * IO (generic over `AnyStr`) * BinaryIO (a simple subtype of `IO[bytes]`) * TextIO (a simple subtype of `IO[str]`) Types related to regular expressions and the `re` module: * Match and Pattern, types of `re.match()` and `re.compile()` results (generic over `AnyStr`) ## Suggested syntax for Python 2.7 and straddling code Some tools may want to support type annotations in code that must be compatible with Python 2.7. For this purpose this PEP has a suggested (but not mandatory) extension where function annotations are placed in a `# type:` comment. Such a comment must be placed immediately following the function header (before the docstring). An example: the following Python 3 code: def embezzle(self, account: str, funds: int = 1000000, *fake_receipts: str) -> None: """Embezzle funds from account using fake receipts.""" <code goes here> is equivalent to the following: def embezzle(self, account, funds=1000000, *fake_receipts): # type: (str, int, *str) -> None """Embezzle funds from account using fake receipts.""" <code goes here> Note that for methods, no type is needed for `self`. For an argument-less method it would look like this: def load_cache(self): # type: () -> bool <code> Sometimes you want to specify the return type for a function or method without (yet) specifying the argument types. To support this explicitly, the argument list may be replaced with an ellipsis. Example: def send_email(address, sender, cc, bcc, subject, body): # type: (...) -> bool """Send an email message. Return True if successful.""" <code> Sometimes you have a long list of parameters and specifying their types in a single `# type:` comment would be awkward. To this end you may list the arguments one per line and add a `# type:` comment per line after an argument's associated comma, if any. To specify the return type use the ellipsis syntax. Specifying the return type is not mandatory and not every argument needs to be given a type. A line with a `# type:` comment should contain exactly one argument. The type comment for the last argument (if any) should precede the close parenthesis. Example: def send_email(address, # type: Union[str, List[str]] sender, # type: str cc, # type: Optional[List[str]] bcc, # type: Optional[List[str]] subject='', body=None # type: List[str] ): # type: (...) -> bool """Send an email message. Return True if successful.""" <code> Notes: - Tools that support this syntax should support it regardless of the Python version being checked. This is necessary in order to support code that straddles Python 2 and Python 3. - It is not allowed for an argument or return value to have both a type annotation and a type comment. - When using the short form (e.g. `# type: (str, int) -> None`) every argument must be accounted for, except the first argument of instance and class methods (those are usually omitted, but it's allowed to include them). - The return type is mandatory for the short form. If in Python 3 you would omit some argument or the return type, the Python 2 notation should use `Any`. - When using the short form, for `*args` and `**kwds`, put 1 or 2 stars in front of the corresponding type annotation. (As with Python 3 annotations, the annotation here denotes the type of the individual argument values, not of the tuple/dict that you receive as the special argument value `args` or `kwds`.) - Like other type comments, any names used in the annotations must be imported or defined by the module containing the annotation. - When using the short form, the entire annotation must be one line. - The short form may also occur on the same line as the close parenthesis, e.g.: def add(a, b): # type: (int, int) -> int return a + b - Misplaced type comments will be flagged as errors by a type checker. If necessary, such comments could be commented twice. For example: def f(): '''Docstring''' # type: () -> None # Error! def g(): '''Docstring''' # # type: () -> None # This is OK When checking Python 2.7 code, type checkers should treat the `int` and `long` types as equivalent. For parameters typed as `Text`, arguments of type `str` as well as `unicode` should be acceptable. ## Rejected Alternatives During discussion of earlier drafts of this PEP, various objections were raised and alternatives were proposed. We discuss some of these here and explain why we reject them. Several main objections were raised. ### Which brackets for generic type parameters? Most people are familiar with the use of angular brackets (e.g. `List<int>`) in languages like C++, Java, C# and Swift to express the parameterization of generic types. The problem with these is that they are really hard to parse, especially for a simple-minded parser like Python. In most languages the ambiguities are usually dealt with by only allowing angular brackets in specific syntactic positions, where general expressions aren't allowed. (And also by using very powerful parsing techniques that can backtrack over an arbitrary section of code.) But in Python, we'd like type expressions to be (syntactically) the same as other expressions, so that we can use e.g. variable assignment to create type aliases. Consider this simple type expression: List<int> From the Python parser's perspective, the expression begins with the same four tokens (NAME, LESS, NAME, GREATER) as a chained comparison: a < b > c # I.e., (a < b) and (b > c) We can even make up an example that could be parsed both ways: a < b > [ c ] Assuming we had angular brackets in the language, this could be interpreted as either of the following two: (a<b>)[c] # I.e., (a<b>).__getitem__(c) a < b > ([c]) # I.e., (a < b) and (b > [c]) It would surely be possible to come up with a rule to disambiguate such cases, but to most users the rules would feel arbitrary and complex. It would also require us to dramatically change the CPython parser (and every other parser for Python). It should be noted that Python's current parser is intentionally "dumb" -- a simple grammar is easier for users to reason about. For all these reasons, square brackets (e.g. `List[int]`) are (and have long been) the preferred syntax for generic type parameters. They can be implemented by defining the `__getitem__()` method on the metaclass, and no new syntax is required at all. This option works in all recent versions of Python (starting with Python 2.2). Python is not alone in this syntactic choice -- generic classes in Scala also use square brackets. ### What about existing uses of annotations? One line of argument points out that PEP 3107 explicitly supports the use of arbitrary expressions in function annotations. The new proposal is then considered incompatible with the specification of PEP 3107. Our response to this is that, first of all, the current proposal does not introduce any direct incompatibilities, so programs using annotations in Python 3.4 will still work correctly and without prejudice in Python 3.5. We do hope that type hints will eventually become the sole use for annotations, but this will require additional discussion and a deprecation period after the initial roll-out of the typing module with Python 3.5. The current PEP will have provisional status (see PEP 411) until Python 3.6 is released. The fastest conceivable scheme would introduce silent deprecation of non-type-hint annotations in 3.6, full deprecation in 3.7, and declare type hints as the only allowed use of annotations in Python 3.8. This should give authors of packages that use annotations plenty of time to devise another approach, even if type hints become an overnight success. (*UPDATE:* As of fall 2017, the timeline for the end of provisional status for this PEP and for the `typing.py` module has changed, and so has the deprecation schedule for other uses of annotations. For the updated schedule see PEP 563.) Another possible outcome would be that type hints will eventually become the default meaning for annotations, but that there will always remain an option to disable them. For this purpose the current proposal defines a decorator `@no_type_check` which disables the default interpretation of annotations as type hints in a given class or function. It also defines a meta-decorator `@no_type_check_decorator` which can be used to decorate a decorator (!), causing annotations in any function or class decorated with the latter to be ignored by the type checker. There are also `# type: ignore` comments, and static checkers should support configuration options to disable type checking in selected packages. Despite all these options, proposals have been circulated to allow type hints and other forms of annotations to coexist for individual arguments. One proposal suggests that if an annotation for a given argument is a dictionary literal, each key represents a different form of annotation, and the key `'type'` would be use for type hints. The problem with this idea and its variants is that the notation becomes very "noisy" and hard to read. Also, in most cases where existing libraries use annotations, there would be little need to combine them with type hints. So the simpler approach of selectively disabling type hints appears sufficient. ### The problem of forward declarations The current proposal is admittedly sub-optimal when type hints must contain forward references. Python requires all names to be defined by the time they are used. Apart from circular imports this is rarely a problem: "use" here means "look up at runtime", and with most "forward" references there is no problem in ensuring that a name is defined before the function using it is called. The problem with type hints is that annotations (per PEP 3107, and similar to default values) are evaluated at the time a function is defined, and thus any names used in an annotation must be already defined when the function is being defined. A common scenario is a class definition whose methods need to reference the class itself in their annotations. (More general, it can also occur with mutually recursive classes.) This is natural for container types, for example: class Node: """Binary tree node.""" def __init__(self, left: Node, right: Node): self.left = left self.right = right As written this will not work, because of the peculiarity in Python that class names become defined once the entire body of the class has been executed. Our solution, which isn't particularly elegant, but gets the job done, is to allow using string literals in annotations. Most of the time you won't have to use this though -- most *uses* of type hints are expected to reference builtin types or types defined in other modules. A counterproposal would change the semantics of type hints so they aren't evaluated at runtime at all (after all, type checking happens off-line, so why would type hints need to be evaluated at runtime at all). This of course would run afoul of backwards compatibility, since the Python interpreter doesn't actually know whether a particular annotation is meant to be a type hint or something else. A compromise is possible where a `__future__` import could enable turning *all* annotations in a given module into string literals, as follows: from __future__ import annotations class ImSet: def add(self, a: ImSet) -> List[ImSet]: ... assert ImSet.add.__annotations__ == {'a': 'ImSet', 'return': 'List[ImSet]'} Such a `__future__` import statement may be proposed in a separate PEP. (*UPDATE:* That `__future__` import statement and its consequences are discussed in PEP 563.) ### The double colon A few creative souls have tried to invent solutions for this problem. For example, it was proposed to use a double colon (`::`) for type hints, solving two problems at once: disambiguating between type hints and other annotations, and changing the semantics to preclude runtime evaluation. There are several things wrong with this idea, however. * It's ugly. The single colon in Python has many uses, and all of them look familiar because they resemble the use of the colon in English text. This is a general rule of thumb by which Python abides for most forms of punctuation; the exceptions are typically well known from other programming languages. But this use of `::` is unheard of in English, and in other languages (e.g. C++) it is used as a scoping operator, which is a very different beast. In contrast, the single colon for type hints reads naturally -- and no wonder, since it was carefully designed for this purpose (the idea long predates PEP 3107). It is also used in the same fashion in other languages from Pascal to Swift. * What would you do for return type annotations? * It's actually a feature that type hints are evaluated at runtime. * Making type hints available at runtime allows runtime type checkers to be built on top of type hints. * It catches mistakes even when the type checker is not run. Since it is a separate program, users may choose not to run it (or even install it), but might still want to use type hints as a concise form of documentation. Broken type hints are no use even for documentation. * Because it's new syntax, using the double colon for type hints would limit them to code that works with Python 3.5 only. By using existing syntax, the current proposal can easily work for older versions of Python 3. (And in fact mypy supports Python 3.2 and newer.) * If type hints become successful we may well decide to add new syntax in the future to declare the type for variables, for example `var age: int = 42`. If we were to use a double colon for argument type hints, for consistency we'd have to use the same convention for future syntax, perpetuating the ugliness. ### Other forms of new syntax A few other forms of alternative syntax have been proposed, e.g. the introduction of a `where` keyword, and Cobra-inspired `requires` clauses. But these all share a problem with the double colon: they won't work for earlier versions of Python 3. The same would apply to a new `__future__` import. ### Other backwards compatible conventions The ideas put forward include: * A decorator, e.g. `@typehints(name=str, returns=str)`. This could work, but it's pretty verbose (an extra line, and the argument names must be repeated), and a far cry in elegance from the PEP 3107 notation. * Stub files. We do want stub files, but they are primarily useful for adding type hints to existing code that doesn't lend itself to adding type hints, e.g. 3rd party packages, code that needs to support both Python 2 and Python 3, and especially extension modules. For most situations, having the annotations in line with the function definitions makes them much more useful. * Docstrings. There is an existing convention for docstrings, based on the Sphinx notation (`:type arg1: description`). This is pretty verbose (an extra line per parameter), and not very elegant. We could also make up something new, but the annotation syntax is hard to beat (because it was designed for this very purpose). It's also been proposed to simply wait another release. But what problem would that solve? It would just be procrastination. ## PEP Development Process A live draft for this PEP lives on GitHub. There is also an issue tracker, where much of the technical discussion takes place. The draft on GitHub is updated regularly in small increments. The official PEPS repo is (usually) only updated when a new draft is posted to python-dev. ## Acknowledgements This document could not be completed without valuable input, encouragement and advice from Jim Baker, Jeremy Siek, Michael Matson Vitousek, Andrey Vlasovskikh, Radomir Dopieralski, Peter Ludemann, and the BDFL-Delegate, Mark Shannon. Influences include existing languages, libraries and frameworks mentioned in PEP 482. Many thanks to their creators, in alphabetical order: Stefan Behnel, William Edwards, Greg Ewing, Larry Hastings, Anders Hejlsberg, Alok Menghrajani, Travis E. Oliphant, Joe Pamer, Raoul-Gabriel Urma, and Julien Verlaguet. ## Copyright This document has been placed in the public domain.

pep-0008.md

PEP 8 -- Style Guide for Python Code

Cited
highlighted in yellow
Expected
underlined in blue
46,718 characters
Back to the answer
# PEP 8 -- Style Guide for Python Code - **Title:** Style Guide for Python Code - **Author:** Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org>, Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org>, Alyssa Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> - **Status:** Active - **Type:** Process - **Created:** 05-Jul-2001 ## Introduction This document gives coding conventions for the Python code comprising the standard library in the main Python distribution. Please see the companion informational PEP describing PEP 7. This document and PEP 257 (Docstring Conventions) were adapted from Guido's original Python Style Guide essay, with some additions from Barry's style guide [2]. This style guide evolves over time as additional conventions are identified and past conventions are rendered obsolete by changes in the language itself. Many projects have their own coding style guidelines. In the event of any conflicts, such project-specific guides take precedence for that project. ## A Foolish Consistency is the Hobgoblin of Little Minds One of Guido's key insights is that code is read much more often than it is written. The guidelines provided here are intended to improve the readability of code and make it consistent across the wide spectrum of Python code. As PEP 20 says, "Readability counts". A style guide is about consistency. Consistency with this style guide is important. Consistency within a project is more important. Consistency within one module or function is the most important. However, know when to be inconsistent -- sometimes style guide recommendations just aren't applicable. When in doubt, use your best judgment. Look at other examples and decide what looks best. And don't hesitate to ask! In particular: do not break backwards compatibility just to comply with this PEP! Some other good reasons to ignore a particular guideline: 1. When applying the guideline would make the code less readable, even for someone who is used to reading code that follows this PEP. 2. To be consistent with surrounding code that also breaks it (maybe for historic reasons) -- although this is also an opportunity to clean up someone else's mess (in true XP style). 3. Because the code in question predates the introduction of the guideline and there is no other reason to be modifying that code. 4. When the code needs to remain compatible with older versions of Python that don't support the feature recommended by the style guide. ## Code Lay-out ### Indentation Use 4 spaces per indentation level. Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets and braces, or using a *hanging indent* [#fn-hi]. When using a hanging indent the following should be considered; there should be no arguments on the first line and further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself as a continuation line: ``text :class: good # Correct: # Aligned with opening delimiter. foo = long_function_name(var_one, var_two, var_three, var_four) # Add 4 spaces (an extra level of indentation) to distinguish arguments from the rest. def long_function_name( var_one, var_two, var_three, var_four): print(var_one) # Hanging indents should add a level. foo = long_function_name( var_one, var_two, var_three, var_four) `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: # Arguments on first line forbidden when not using vertical alignment. foo = long_function_name(var_one, var_two, var_three, var_four) # Further indentation required as indentation is not distinguishable. def long_function_name( var_one, var_two, var_three, var_four): print(var_one) `` The 4-space rule is optional for continuation lines. Optional: ``text :class: good # Hanging indents *may* be indented to other than 4 spaces. foo = long_function_name( var_one, var_two, var_three, var_four) `` When the conditional part of an `if`-statement is long enough to require that it be written across multiple lines, it's worth noting that the combination of a two character keyword (i.e. `if`), plus a single space, plus an opening parenthesis creates a natural 4-space indent for the subsequent lines of the multiline conditional. This can produce a visual conflict with the indented suite of code nested inside the `if`-statement, which would also naturally be indented to 4 spaces. This PEP takes no explicit position on how (or whether) to further visually distinguish such conditional lines from the nested suite inside the `if`-statement. Acceptable options in this situation include, but are not limited to: ``text :class: good # No extra indentation. if (this_is_one_thing and that_is_another_thing): do_something() # Add a comment, which will provide some distinction in editors # supporting syntax highlighting. if (this_is_one_thing and that_is_another_thing): # Since both conditions are true, we can frobnicate. do_something() # Add some extra indentation on the conditional continuation line. if (this_is_one_thing and that_is_another_thing): do_something() `` (Also see the discussion of whether to break before or after binary operators below.) The closing brace/bracket/parenthesis on multiline constructs may either line up under the first non-whitespace character of the last line of list, as in: ``text :class: good my_list = [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ] result = some_function_that_takes_arguments( 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', ) `` or it may be lined up under the first character of the line that starts the multiline construct, as in: ``text :class: good my_list = [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ] result = some_function_that_takes_arguments( 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', ) `` ### Tabs or Spaces? Spaces are the preferred indentation method. Tabs should be used solely to remain consistent with code that is already indented with tabs. Python disallows mixing tabs and spaces for indentation. ### Maximum Line Length Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text with fewer structural restrictions (docstrings or comments), the line length should be limited to 72 characters. Limiting the required editor window width makes it possible to have several files open side by side, and works well when using code review tools that present the two versions in adjacent columns. The default wrapping in most tools disrupts the visual structure of the code, making it more difficult to understand. The limits are chosen to avoid wrapping in editors with the window width set to 80, even if the tool places a marker glyph in the final column when wrapping lines. Some web based tools may not offer dynamic line wrapping at all. Some teams strongly prefer a longer line length. For code maintained exclusively or primarily by a team that can reach agreement on this issue, it is okay to increase the line length limit up to 99 characters, provided that comments and docstrings are still wrapped at 72 characters. The Python standard library is conservative and requires limiting lines to 79 characters (and docstrings/comments to 72). The preferred way of wrapping long lines is by using Python's implied line continuation inside parentheses, brackets and braces. Long lines can be broken over multiple lines by wrapping expressions in parentheses. These should be used in preference to using a backslash for line continuation. Backslashes may still be appropriate at times. For example, long, multiple `with`-statements could not use implicit continuation before Python 3.10, so backslashes were acceptable for that case: ``text :class: maybe with open('/path/to/some/file/you/want/to/read') as file_1, \ open('/path/to/some/file/being/written', 'w') as file_2: file_2.write(file_1.read()) `` (See the previous discussion on multiline if-statements for further thoughts on the indentation of such multiline `with`-statements.) Another such case is with `assert` statements. Make sure to indent the continued line appropriately. ### Should a Line Break Before or After a Binary Operator? For decades the recommended style was to break after binary operators. But this can hurt readability in two ways: the operators tend to get scattered across different columns on the screen, and each operator is moved away from its operand and onto the previous line. Here, the eye has to do extra work to tell which items are added and which are subtracted: ``text :class: bad # Wrong: # operators sit far away from their operands income = (gross_wages + taxable_interest + (dividends - qualified_dividends) - ira_deduction - student_loan_interest) `` To solve this readability problem, mathematicians and their publishers follow the opposite convention. Donald Knuth explains the traditional rule in his *Computers and Typesetting* series: "Although formulas within a paragraph always break after binary operations and relations, displayed formulas always break before binary operations" [3]. Following the tradition from mathematics usually results in more readable code: ``text :class: good # Correct: # easy to match operators with operands income = (gross_wages + taxable_interest + (dividends - qualified_dividends) - ira_deduction - student_loan_interest) `` In Python code, it is permissible to break before or after a binary operator, as long as the convention is consistent locally. For new code Knuth's style is suggested. ### Blank Lines Surround top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines. Method definitions inside a class are surrounded by a single blank line. Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of related functions. Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations). Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical sections. Python accepts the control-L (i.e. ^L) form feed character as whitespace; many tools treat these characters as page separators, so you may use them to separate pages of related sections of your file. Note, some editors and web-based code viewers may not recognize control-L as a form feed and will show another glyph in its place. ### Source File Encoding Code in the core Python distribution should always use UTF-8, and should not have an encoding declaration. In the standard library, non-UTF-8 encodings should be used only for test purposes. Use non-ASCII characters sparingly, preferably only to denote places and human names. If using non-ASCII characters as data, avoid noisy Unicode characters like z̯̯͡a̧͎̺l̡͓̫g̹̲o̡̼̘ and byte order marks. All identifiers in the Python standard library MUST use ASCII-only identifiers, and SHOULD use English words wherever feasible (in many cases, abbreviations and technical terms are used which aren't English). Open source projects with a global audience are encouraged to adopt a similar policy. ### Imports - Imports should usually be on separate lines: ``text :class: good # Correct: import os import sys `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: import sys, os `` It's okay to say this though: ``text :class: good # Correct: from subprocess import Popen, PIPE `` - Imports are always put at the top of the file, just after any module comments and docstrings, and before module globals and constants. Imports should be grouped in the following order: 1. Standard library imports. 2. Related third party imports. 3. Local application/library specific imports. You should put a blank line between each group of imports. - Absolute imports are recommended, as they are usually more readable and tend to be better behaved (or at least give better error messages) if the import system is incorrectly configured (such as when a directory inside a package ends up on `sys.path`): ``text :class: good import mypkg.sibling from mypkg import sibling from mypkg.sibling import example `` However, explicit relative imports are an acceptable alternative to absolute imports, especially when dealing with complex package layouts where using absolute imports would be unnecessarily verbose: ``text :class: good from . import sibling from .sibling import example `` Standard library code should avoid complex package layouts and always use absolute imports. - When importing a class from a class-containing module, it's usually okay to spell this: ``text :class: good from myclass import MyClass from foo.bar.yourclass import YourClass `` If this spelling causes local name clashes, then spell them explicitly: ``text :class: good import myclass import foo.bar.yourclass `` and use `myclass.MyClass` and `foo.bar.yourclass.YourClass`. - Wildcard imports (`from <module> import *`) should be avoided, as they make it unclear which names are present in the namespace, confusing both readers and many automated tools. There is one defensible use case for a wildcard import, which is to republish an internal interface as part of a public API (for example, overwriting a pure Python implementation of an interface with the definitions from an optional accelerator module and exactly which definitions will be overwritten isn't known in advance). When republishing names this way, the guidelines below regarding public and internal interfaces still apply. ### Module Level Dunder Names Module level "dunders" (i.e. names with two leading and two trailing underscores) such as `__all__`, `__author__`, `__version__`, etc. should be placed after the module docstring but before any import statements *except* `from __future__` imports. Python mandates that future-imports must appear in the module before any other code except docstrings: ``text :class: good """This is the example module. This module does stuff. """ from __future__ import barry_as_FLUFL __all__ = ['a', 'b', 'c'] __version__ = '0.1' __author__ = 'Cardinal Biggles' import os import sys `` ## String Quotes In Python, single-quoted strings and double-quoted strings are the same. This PEP does not make a recommendation for this. Pick a rule and stick to it. When a string contains single or double quote characters, however, use the other one to avoid backslashes in the string. It improves readability. For triple-quoted strings, always use double quote characters to be consistent with the docstring convention in PEP 257. ## Whitespace in Expressions and Statements ### Pet Peeves Avoid extraneous whitespace in the following situations: - Immediately inside parentheses, brackets or braces: ``text :class: good # Correct: spam(ham[1], {eggs: 2}) `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: spam( ham[ 1 ], { eggs: 2 } ) `` - Between a trailing comma and a following close parenthesis: ``text :class: good # Correct: foo = (0,) `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: bar = (0, ) `` - Immediately before a comma, semicolon, or colon: ``text :class: good # Correct: if x == 4: print(x, y); x, y = y, x `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: if x == 4 : print(x , y) ; x , y = y , x `` - However, in a slice the colon acts like a binary operator, and should have equal amounts on either side (treating it as the operator with the lowest priority). In an extended slice, both colons must have the same amount of spacing applied. Exception: when a slice parameter is omitted, the space is omitted: ``text :class: good # Correct: ham[1:9], ham[1:9:3], ham[:9:3], ham[1::3], ham[1:9:] ham[lower:upper], ham[lower:upper:], ham[lower::step] ham[lower+offset : upper+offset] ham[: upper_fn(x) : step_fn(x)], ham[:: step_fn(x)] ham[lower + offset : upper + offset] `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: ham[lower + offset:upper + offset] ham[1: 9], ham[1 :9], ham[1:9 :3] ham[lower : : step] ham[ : upper] `` - Immediately before the open parenthesis that starts the argument list of a function call: ``text :class: good # Correct: spam(1) `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: spam (1) `` - Immediately before the open parenthesis that starts an indexing or slicing: ``text :class: good # Correct: dct['key'] = lst[index] `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: dct ['key'] = lst [index] `` - More than one space around an assignment (or other) operator to align it with another: ``text :class: good # Correct: x = 1 y = 2 long_variable = 3 `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: x = 1 y = 2 long_variable = 3 `` ### Other Recommendations - Avoid trailing whitespace anywhere. Because it's usually invisible, it can be confusing: e.g. a backslash followed by a space and a newline does not count as a line continuation marker. Some editors don't preserve it and many projects (like CPython itself) have pre-commit hooks that reject it. - Always surround these binary operators with a single space on either side: assignment (`=`), augmented assignment (`+=`, `-=` etc.), comparisons (`==`, `<`, `>`, `!=`, `<=`, `>=`, `in`, `not in`, `is`, `is not`), Booleans (`and`, `or`, `not`). - If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding whitespace around the operators with the lowest priority(ies). Use your own judgment; however, never use more than one space, and always have the same amount of whitespace on both sides of a binary operator: ``text :class: good # Correct: i = i + 1 submitted += 1 x = x*2 - 1 hypot2 = x*x + y*y c = (a+b) * (a-b) `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: i=i+1 submitted +=1 x = x * 2 - 1 hypot2 = x * x + y * y c = (a + b) * (a - b) `` - Function annotations should use the normal rules for colons and always have spaces around the `->` arrow if present. (See Function Annotations below for more about function annotations.): ``text :class: good # Correct: def munge(input: AnyStr): ... def munge() -> PosInt: ... `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: def munge(input:AnyStr): ... def munge()->PosInt: ... `` - Don't use spaces around the `=` sign when used to indicate a keyword argument, or when used to indicate a default value for an *unannotated* function parameter: ``text :class: good # Correct: def complex(real, imag=0.0): return magic(r=real, i=imag) `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: def complex(real, imag = 0.0): return magic(r = real, i = imag) `` When combining an argument annotation with a default value, however, do use spaces around the `=` sign: ``text :class: good # Correct: def munge(sep: AnyStr = None): ... def munge(input: AnyStr, sep: AnyStr = None, limit=1000): ... `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: def munge(input: AnyStr=None): ... def munge(input: AnyStr, limit = 1000): ... `` - Compound statements (multiple statements on the same line) are generally discouraged: ``text :class: good # Correct: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing() do_one() do_two() do_three() `` Rather not: ``text :class: bad # Wrong: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing() do_one(); do_two(); do_three() `` - While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements. Also avoid folding such long lines! Rather not: ``text :class: bad # Wrong: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing() for x in lst: total += x while t < 10: t = delay() `` Definitely not: ``text :class: bad # Wrong: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing() else: do_non_blah_thing() try: something() finally: cleanup() do_one(); do_two(); do_three(long, argument, list, like, this) if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three() `` ## When to Use Trailing Commas Trailing commas are usually optional, except they are mandatory when making a tuple of one element. For clarity, it is recommended to surround the latter in (technically redundant) parentheses: ``text :class: good # Correct: FILES = ('setup.cfg',) `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: FILES = 'setup.cfg', `` When trailing commas are redundant, they are often helpful when a version control system is used, when a list of values, arguments or imported items is expected to be extended over time. The pattern is to put each value (etc.) on a line by itself, always adding a trailing comma, and add the close parenthesis/bracket/brace on the next line. However it does not make sense to have a trailing comma on the same line as the closing delimiter (except in the above case of singleton tuples): ``text :class: good # Correct: FILES = [ 'setup.cfg', 'tox.ini', ] initialize(FILES, error=True, ) `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: FILES = ['setup.cfg', 'tox.ini',] initialize(FILES, error=True,) `` ## Comments Comments that contradict the code are worse than no comments. Always make a priority of keeping the comments up-to-date when the code changes! Comments should be complete sentences. The first word should be capitalized, unless it is an identifier that begins with a lower case letter (never alter the case of identifiers!). Block comments generally consist of one or more paragraphs built out of complete sentences, with each sentence ending in a period. You should use one or two spaces after a sentence-ending period in multi-sentence comments, except after the final sentence. Ensure that your comments are clear and easily understandable to other speakers of the language you are writing in. Python coders from non-English speaking countries: please write your comments in English, unless you are 120% sure that the code will never be read by people who don't speak your language. ### Block Comments Block comments generally apply to some (or all) code that follows them, and are indented to the same level as that code. Each line of a block comment starts with a `#` and a single space (unless it is indented text inside the comment). Paragraphs inside a block comment are separated by a line containing a single `#`. ### Inline Comments Use inline comments sparingly. An inline comment is a comment on the same line as a statement. Inline comments should be separated by at least two spaces from the statement. They should start with a # and a single space. Inline comments are unnecessary and in fact distracting if they state the obvious. Don't do this: ``text :class: bad x = x + 1 # Increment x `` But sometimes, this is useful: ``text :class: good x = x + 1 # Compensate for border `` ### Documentation Strings Conventions for writing good documentation strings (a.k.a. "docstrings") are immortalized in PEP 257. - Write docstrings for all public modules, functions, classes, and methods. Docstrings are not necessary for non-public methods, but you should have a comment that describes what the method does. This comment should appear after the `def` line. - PEP 257 describes good docstring conventions. Note that most importantly, the `"""` that ends a multiline docstring should be on a line by itself: ``text :class: good """Return a foobang Optional plotz says to frobnicate the bizbaz first. """ `` - For one liner docstrings, please keep the closing `"""` on the same line: ``text :class: good """Return an ex-parrot.""" `` ## Naming Conventions The naming conventions of Python's library are a bit of a mess, so we'll never get this completely consistent -- nevertheless, here are the currently recommended naming standards. New modules and packages (including third party frameworks) should be written to these standards, but where an existing library has a different style, internal consistency is preferred. ### Overriding Principle Names that are visible to the user as public parts of the API should follow conventions that reflect usage rather than implementation. ### Descriptive: Naming Styles There are a lot of different naming styles. It helps to be able to recognize what naming style is being used, independently from what they are used for. The following naming styles are commonly distinguished: - `b` (single lowercase letter) - `B` (single uppercase letter) - `lowercase` - `lower_case_with_underscores` - `UPPERCASE` - `UPPER_CASE_WITH_UNDERSCORES` - `CapitalizedWords` (or CapWords, or CamelCase -- so named because of the bumpy look of its letters [4]). This is also sometimes known as StudlyCaps. Note: When using acronyms in CapWords, capitalize all the letters of the acronym. Thus HTTPServerError is better than HttpServerError. - `mixedCase` (differs from CapitalizedWords by initial lowercase character!) - `Capitalized_Words_With_Underscores` (ugly!) There's also the style of using a short unique prefix to group related names together. This is not used much in Python, but it is mentioned for completeness. For example, the `os.stat()` function returns a tuple whose items traditionally have names like `st_mode`, `st_size`, `st_mtime` and so on. (This is done to emphasize the correspondence with the fields of the POSIX system call struct, which helps programmers familiar with that.) The X11 library uses a leading X for all its public functions. In Python, this style is generally deemed unnecessary because attribute and method names are prefixed with an object, and function names are prefixed with a module name. In addition, the following special forms using leading or trailing underscores are recognized (these can generally be combined with any case convention): - `_single_leading_underscore`: weak "internal use" indicator. E.g. `from M import *` does not import objects whose names start with an underscore. - `single_trailing_underscore_`: used by convention to avoid conflicts with Python keyword, e.g. : ``text :class: good tkinter.Toplevel(master, class_='ClassName') `` - `__double_leading_underscore`: when naming a class attribute, invokes name mangling (inside class FooBar, `__boo` becomes `_FooBar__boo`; see below). - `__double_leading_and_trailing_underscore__`: "magic" objects or attributes that live in user-controlled namespaces. E.g. `__init__`, `__import__` or `__file__`. Never invent such names; only use them as documented. ### Prescriptive: Naming Conventions #### Names to Avoid Never use the characters 'l' (lowercase letter el), 'O' (uppercase letter oh), or 'I' (uppercase letter eye) as single character variable names. In some fonts, these characters are indistinguishable from the numerals one and zero. When tempted to use 'l', use 'L' instead. #### ASCII Compatibility Identifiers used in the standard library must be ASCII compatible as described in the PEP 3131#policy-specification of PEP 3131. #### Package and Module Names Modules should have short, all-lowercase names. Underscores can be used in the module name if it improves readability. Python packages should also have short, all-lowercase names, although the use of underscores is discouraged. When an extension module written in C or C++ has an accompanying Python module that provides a higher level (e.g. more object oriented) interface, the C/C++ module has a leading underscore (e.g. `_socket`). #### Class Names Class names should normally use the CapWords convention. The naming convention for functions may be used instead in cases where the interface is documented and used primarily as a callable. Note that there is a separate convention for builtin names: most builtin names are single words (or two words run together), with the CapWords convention used only for exception names and builtin constants. #### Type Variable Names Names of type variables introduced in PEP 484 should normally use CapWords preferring short names: `T`, `AnyStr`, `Num`. It is recommended to add suffixes `_co` or `_contra` to the variables used to declare covariant or contravariant behavior correspondingly: ``text :class: good from typing import TypeVar VT_co = TypeVar('VT_co', covariant=True) KT_contra = TypeVar('KT_contra', contravariant=True) `` #### Exception Names Because exceptions should be classes, the class naming convention applies here. However, you should use the suffix "Error" on your exception names (if the exception actually is an error). #### Global Variable Names (Let's hope that these variables are meant for use inside one module only.) The conventions are about the same as those for functions. Modules that are designed for use via `from M import *` should use the `__all__` mechanism to prevent exporting globals, or use the older convention of prefixing such globals with an underscore (which you might want to do to indicate these globals are "module non-public"). #### Function and Variable Names Function names should be lowercase, with words separated by underscores as necessary to improve readability. Variable names follow the same convention as function names. mixedCase is allowed only in contexts where that's already the prevailing style (e.g. threading.py), to retain backwards compatibility. #### Function and Method Arguments Always use `self` for the first argument to instance methods. Always use `cls` for the first argument to class methods. If a function argument's name clashes with a reserved keyword, it is generally better to append a single trailing underscore rather than use an abbreviation or spelling corruption. Thus `class_` is better than `clss`. (Perhaps better is to avoid such clashes by using a synonym.) #### Method Names and Instance Variables Use the function naming rules: lowercase with words separated by underscores as necessary to improve readability. Use one leading underscore only for non-public methods and instance variables. To avoid name clashes with subclasses, use two leading underscores to invoke Python's name mangling rules. Python mangles these names with the class name: if class Foo has an attribute named `__a`, it cannot be accessed by `Foo.__a`. (An insistent user could still gain access by calling `Foo._Foo__a`.) Generally, double leading underscores should be used only to avoid name conflicts with attributes in classes designed to be subclassed. Note: there is some controversy about the use of __names (see below). #### Constants Constants are usually defined on a module level and written in all capital letters with underscores separating words. Examples include `MAX_OVERFLOW` and `TOTAL`. #### Designing for Inheritance Always decide whether a class's methods and instance variables (collectively: "attributes") should be public or non-public. If in doubt, choose non-public; it's easier to make it public later than to make a public attribute non-public. Public attributes are those that you expect unrelated clients of your class to use, with your commitment to avoid backwards incompatible changes. Non-public attributes are those that are not intended to be used by third parties; you make no guarantees that non-public attributes won't change or even be removed. We don't use the term "private" here, since no attribute is really private in Python (without a generally unnecessary amount of work). Another category of attributes are those that are part of the "subclass API" (often called "protected" in other languages). Some classes are designed to be inherited from, either to extend or modify aspects of the class's behavior. When designing such a class, take care to make explicit decisions about which attributes are public, which are part of the subclass API, and which are truly only to be used by your base class. With this in mind, here are the Pythonic guidelines: - Public attributes should have no leading underscores. - If your public attribute name collides with a reserved keyword, append a single trailing underscore to your attribute name. This is preferable to an abbreviation or corrupted spelling. (However, notwithstanding this rule, 'cls' is the preferred spelling for any variable or argument which is known to be a class, especially the first argument to a class method.) Note 1: See the argument name recommendation above for class methods. - For simple public data attributes, it is best to expose just the attribute name, without complicated accessor/mutator methods. Keep in mind that Python provides an easy path to future enhancement, should you find that a simple data attribute needs to grow functional behavior. In that case, use properties to hide functional implementation behind simple data attribute access syntax. Note 1: Try to keep the functional behavior side-effect free, although side-effects such as caching are generally fine. Note 2: Avoid using properties for computationally expensive operations; the attribute notation makes the caller believe that access is (relatively) cheap. - If your class is intended to be subclassed, and you have attributes that you do not want subclasses to use, consider naming them with double leading underscores and no trailing underscores. This invokes Python's name mangling algorithm, where the name of the class is mangled into the attribute name. This helps avoid attribute name collisions should subclasses inadvertently contain attributes with the same name. Note 1: Note that only the simple class name is used in the mangled name, so if a subclass chooses both the same class name and attribute name, you can still get name collisions. Note 2: Name mangling can make certain uses, such as debugging and `__getattr__()`, less convenient. However the name mangling algorithm is well documented and easy to perform manually. Note 3: Not everyone likes name mangling. Try to balance the need to avoid accidental name clashes with potential use by advanced callers. ### Public and Internal Interfaces Any backwards compatibility guarantees apply only to public interfaces. Accordingly, it is important that users be able to clearly distinguish between public and internal interfaces. Documented interfaces are considered public, unless the documentation explicitly declares them to be provisional or internal interfaces exempt from the usual backwards compatibility guarantees. All undocumented interfaces should be assumed to be internal. To better support introspection, modules should explicitly declare the names in their public API using the `__all__` attribute. Setting `__all__` to an empty list indicates that the module has no public API. Even with `__all__` set appropriately, internal interfaces (packages, modules, classes, functions, attributes or other names) should still be prefixed with a single leading underscore. An interface is also considered internal if any containing namespace (package, module or class) is considered internal. Imported names should always be considered an implementation detail. Other modules must not rely on indirect access to such imported names unless they are an explicitly documented part of the containing module's API, such as `os.path` or a package's `__init__` module that exposes functionality from submodules. ## Programming Recommendations - Code should be written in a way that does not disadvantage other implementations of Python (PyPy, Jython, IronPython, Cython, Psyco, and such). For example, do not rely on CPython's efficient implementation of in-place string concatenation for statements in the form `a += b` or `a = a + b`. This optimization is fragile even in CPython (it only works for some types) and isn't present at all in implementations that don't use refcounting. In performance sensitive parts of the library, the `''.join()` form should be used instead. This will ensure that concatenation occurs in linear time across various implementations. - Comparisons to singletons like None should always be done with `is` or `is not`, never the equality operators. Also, beware of writing `if x` when you really mean `if x is not None` -- e.g. when testing whether a variable or argument that defaults to None was set to some other value. The other value might have a type (such as a container) that could be false in a boolean context! - Use `is not` operator rather than `not ... is`. While both expressions are functionally identical, the former is more readable and preferred: ``text :class: good # Correct: if foo is not None: `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: if not foo is None: `` - When implementing ordering operations with rich comparisons, it is best to implement all six operations (`__eq__`, `__ne__`, `__lt__`, `__le__`, `__gt__`, `__ge__`) rather than relying on other code to only exercise a particular comparison. To minimize the effort involved, the `functools.total_ordering()` decorator provides a tool to generate missing comparison methods. PEP 207 indicates that reflexivity rules *are* assumed by Python. Thus, the interpreter may swap `y > x` with `x < y`, `y >= x` with `x <= y`, and may swap the arguments of `x == y` and ``x != y`. The `sort()` and `min()`` operations are guaranteed to use the `<` operator and the `max()` function uses the `>` operator. However, it is best to implement all six operations so that confusion doesn't arise in other contexts. - Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that binds a lambda expression directly to an identifier: ``text :class: good # Correct: def f(x): return 2*x `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: f = lambda x: 2*x `` The first form means that the name of the resulting function object is specifically 'f' instead of the generic '<lambda>'. This is more useful for tracebacks and string representations in general. The use of the assignment statement eliminates the sole benefit a lambda expression can offer over an explicit def statement (i.e. that it can be embedded inside a larger expression) - Derive exceptions from `Exception` rather than `BaseException`. Direct inheritance from `BaseException` is reserved for exceptions where catching them is almost always the wrong thing to do. Design exception hierarchies based on the distinctions that code *catching* the exceptions is likely to need, rather than the locations where the exceptions are raised. Aim to answer the question "What went wrong?" programmatically, rather than only stating that "A problem occurred" (see PEP 3151 for an example of this lesson being learned for the builtin exception hierarchy) Class naming conventions apply here, although you should add the suffix "Error" to your exception classes if the exception is an error. Non-error exceptions that are used for non-local flow control or other forms of signaling need no special suffix. - Use exception chaining appropriately. `raise X from Y` should be used to indicate explicit replacement without losing the original traceback. When deliberately replacing an inner exception (using `raise X from None`), ensure that relevant details are transferred to the new exception (such as preserving the attribute name when converting KeyError to AttributeError, or embedding the text of the original exception in the new exception message). - When catching exceptions, mention specific exceptions whenever possible instead of using a bare `except:` clause: ``text :class: good try: import platform_specific_module except ImportError: platform_specific_module = None `` A bare `except:` clause will catch SystemExit and KeyboardInterrupt exceptions, making it harder to interrupt a program with Control-C, and can disguise other problems. If you want to catch all exceptions that signal program errors, use `except Exception:` (bare except is equivalent to `except BaseException:`). A good rule of thumb is to limit use of bare 'except' clauses to two cases: 1. If the exception handler will be printing out or logging the traceback; at least the user will be aware that an error has occurred. 2. If the code needs to do some cleanup work, but then lets the exception propagate upwards with `raise`. `try...finally` can be a better way to handle this case. - When catching operating system errors, prefer the explicit exception hierarchy introduced in Python 3.3 over introspection of `errno` values. - Additionally, for all try/except clauses, limit the `try` clause to the absolute minimum amount of code necessary. Again, this avoids masking bugs: ``text :class: good # Correct: try: value = collection[key] except KeyError: return key_not_found(key) else: return handle_value(value) `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: try: # Too broad! return handle_value(collection[key]) except KeyError: # Will also catch KeyError raised by handle_value() return key_not_found(key) `` - When a resource is local to a particular section of code, use a `with` statement to ensure it is cleaned up promptly and reliably after use. A try/finally statement is also acceptable. - Context managers should be invoked through separate functions or methods whenever they do something other than acquire and release resources: ``text :class: good # Correct: with conn.begin_transaction(): do_stuff_in_transaction(conn) `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: with conn: do_stuff_in_transaction(conn) `` The latter example doesn't provide any information to indicate that the `__enter__` and `__exit__` methods are doing something other than closing the connection after a transaction. Being explicit is important in this case. - Be consistent in return statements. Either all return statements in a function should return an expression, or none of them should. If any return statement returns an expression, any return statements where no value is returned should explicitly state this as `return None`, and an explicit return statement should be present at the end of the function (if reachable): ``text :class: good # Correct: def foo(x): if x >= 0: return math.sqrt(x) else: return None def bar(x): if x < 0: return None return math.sqrt(x) `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: def foo(x): if x >= 0: return math.sqrt(x) def bar(x): if x < 0: return return math.sqrt(x) `` - Use `''.startswith()` and `''.endswith()` instead of string slicing to check for prefixes or suffixes. startswith() and endswith() are cleaner and less error prone: ``text :class: good # Correct: if foo.startswith('bar'): `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: if foo[:3] == 'bar': `` - Object type comparisons should always use isinstance() instead of comparing types directly: ``text :class: good # Correct: if isinstance(obj, int): `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: if type(obj) is type(1): `` - For sequences, (strings, lists, tuples), use the fact that empty sequences are false: ``text :class: good # Correct: if not seq: if seq: `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: if len(seq): if not len(seq): `` - Don't write string literals that rely on significant trailing whitespace. Such trailing whitespace is visually indistinguishable and some editors (or more recently, reindent.py) will trim them. - Don't compare boolean values to True or False using `==`: ``text :class: good # Correct: if greeting: `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: if greeting == True: `` Worse: ``text :class: bad # Wrong: if greeting is True: `` - Use of the flow control statements `return`/`break`/`continue` within the finally suite of a `try...finally`, where the flow control statement would jump outside the finally suite, is discouraged. This is because such statements will implicitly cancel any active exception that is propagating through the finally suite: ``text :class: bad # Wrong: def foo(): try: 1 / 0 finally: return 42 `` ### Function Annotations With the acceptance of PEP 484, the style rules for function annotations have changed. - Function annotations should use PEP 484 syntax (there are some formatting recommendations for annotations in the previous section). - The experimentation with annotation styles that was recommended previously in this PEP is no longer encouraged. - However, outside the stdlib, experiments within the rules of PEP 484 are now encouraged. For example, marking up a large third party library or application with PEP 484 style type annotations, reviewing how easy it was to add those annotations, and observing whether their presence increases code understandability. - The Python standard library should be conservative in adopting such annotations, but their use is allowed for new code and for big refactorings. - For code that wants to make a different use of function annotations it is recommended to put a comment of the form: ``text :class: good # type: ignore `` near the top of the file; this tells type checkers to ignore all annotations. (More fine-grained ways of disabling complaints from type checkers can be found in PEP 484.) - Like linters, type checkers are optional, separate tools. Python interpreters by default should not issue any messages due to type checking and should not alter their behavior based on annotations. - Users who don't want to use type checkers are free to ignore them. However, it is expected that users of third party library packages may want to run type checkers over those packages. For this purpose PEP 484 recommends the use of stub files: .pyi files that are read by the type checker in preference of the corresponding .py files. Stub files can be distributed with a library, or separately (with the library author's permission) through the typeshed repo [5]. ### Variable Annotations PEP 526 introduced variable annotations. The style recommendations for them are similar to those on function annotations described above: - Annotations for module level variables, class and instance variables, and local variables should have a single space after the colon. - There should be no space before the colon. - If an assignment has a right hand side, then the equality sign should have exactly one space on both sides: ``text :class: good # Correct: code: int class Point: coords: Tuple[int, int] label: str = '<unknown>' `` ``text :class: bad # Wrong: code:int # No space after colon code : int # Space before colon class Test: result: int=0 # No spaces around equality sign `` - Although the PEP 526 is accepted for Python 3.6, the variable annotation syntax is the preferred syntax for stub files on all versions of Python (see PEP 484 for details). ## References ## Copyright This document has been placed in the public domain.